The World Has Moved On

The World Has Moved On: Kahu Advocacy Foundation
Research Series: Page 3 of 5

The World Has
Moved On.
India Has Not.

A comprehensive global census of every jurisdiction where voluntary assisted dying is now legal: 24 years of evidence, 26 jurisdictions, over 200 million people, and why India's silence is a policy failure, not a position.

0 Legal Jurisdictions
0 People With Access
2002 First Law: Netherlands
0 Canadians Assisted Since 2016
0 Of Global Evidence

The Global Picture in 2026

As of April 2026, voluntary assisted dying — encompassing active euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide — is legally recognised in at least 26 distinct jurisdictions across four continents. The shift has been fastest in the past decade, with more countries legalising between 2016 and 2026 than in the preceding 70 years combined.

0
Countries with Euthanasia or PAS
Nationwide laws
0
U.S. State Jurisdictions
As of 2026
0
Australian States
All legal 2019–2023
0
New Laws Passed
Since Jan 2025 (Uruguay, Isle of Man, NY/IL)

Two Decades of Legal Expansion

The Netherlands became the first modern nation to codify voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in 2002. Belgium followed weeks later. For nearly a decade, progress was slow. Then, from 2015 onward, a wave of court-driven and legislative reforms transformed the landscape: in Canada, Colombia, Australia, Spain, New Zealand, and beyond.

By 2026, the countries that have legalised assisted dying span every continent except Africa and Antarctica. They include conservative Catholic nations (Belgium, Colombia, Spain), common law jurisdictions (Canada, Australia, New Zealand), civil law systems (Netherlands, Luxembourg), and constitutional-court-driven reforms (Colombia, Ecuador, Italy: partially).

Key Distinction

Euthanasia: A physician administers the lethal substance directly. Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS): A physician prescribes; the patient self-administers. Many jurisdictions now allow both. India criminalises both under IPC Sections 302, 304, and 306.

India's Position

India permits only passive euthanasia and advance directives under strict Supreme Court conditions (Common Cause 2018). Voluntary active euthanasia and PAS remain criminalised. The gap between India and global best practice has never been wider.

Cumulative Jurisdictions Legalising Assisted Dying
1942 to 2026 · Major milestones only

Every Jurisdiction: Where It Is Legal

A complete inventory of every country and subnational jurisdiction where some form of voluntary assisted dying is legally recognised as of April 2026, with year of legalisation, legal pathway, and type of practice permitted.

Country Year Legal Pathway Type Permitted Key Eligibility Note Status
Netherlands 2002 Parliamentary law Euthanasia + PAS Unbearable suffering, no prospect of improvement; minors from age 12 Active
Belgium 2002 Parliamentary law Euthanasia + PAS Any age (2014+); terminal and non-terminal; psychiatric conditions eligible Active
Switzerland 1942* Absence of prohibition (Penal Code Art. 115) PAS only No residency requirement; non-physicians can assist; Dignitas model Active
Luxembourg 2009 Parliamentary law Euthanasia + PAS Terminal or serious incurable condition; adults only Active
Colombia 2015 Constitutional Court Euthanasia Terminal illness; 2021 extended beyond terminal; no age limit set Active
Canada 2016 Supreme Court + legislation (C-14, C-7) Euthanasia + PAS Adults 18+; grievous and irremediable condition; expanded 2021 (non-terminal Track 2) Active
Spain 2021 Parliamentary law (Organic Law 3/2021) Euthanasia + PAS Serious incurable or debilitating disease; adults; residents/citizens Active
New Zealand 2021 Referendum (65.1% in favour) Euthanasia + PAS Terminal illness; 6-month prognosis; 18+; residents Active
Austria 2022 Constitutional Court ruling PAS only Adults; terminal or permanent severe condition; physician prescription required Active
Germany 2020* Federal Constitutional Court PAS only Right to self-determined death; no legislation yet; de facto access Partial · Court-Driven
Ecuador 2024 Constitutional Court Euthanasia Intense suffering; serious incurable condition; case of Paola Roldan (ALS) Active
Portugal 2023 (law) Parliamentary law (Law 22/2023) Euthanasia + PAS Law passed May 2023; regulation pending; not yet in force as of April 2026 Law Passed · Not Yet In Force
Uruguay 2025 Parliamentary law (Oct 2025) Euthanasia Terminal incurable disease; mentally competent adults; no time limit imposed Awaiting Regulation
Italy 2019* Constitutional Court (partial) PAS only (narrow) Very narrow eligibility; no national law; only 14 known cases to March 2026 Partial · No National Law
* Switzerland: no dedicated law; legal by absence of "selfish motive" clause since 1942. Germany: BVerfG ruling 2020; no legislation enacted. Italy: Corte Costituzionale ruling Case 242/2019. Sources: Wikipedia Legality of Euthanasia (updated April 2026); allaboutlawyer.com; Belgian Federal Commission 2024; Health Canada 2025.
State / District Year Law Name Type Prognosis Requirement
Oregon1997Death with Dignity ActPAS6 months terminal
Washington2009Death with Dignity ActPAS6 months terminal
Montana2009Court Ruling (Baxter v. Montana)PASTerminal · no time limit
Vermont2013Patient Choice and Control at End of Life ActPAS6 months terminal
California2016End of Life Option ActPAS6 months terminal
Colorado2016End-of-Life Options ActPAS6 months terminal
Washington D.C.2017Death with Dignity ActPAS6 months terminal
Hawaii2019Our Care, Our Choice ActPAS6 months terminal
New Jersey2019Medical Aid in Dying for the Terminally Ill ActPAS6 months terminal
Maine2019Death with Dignity ActPAS6 months terminal
New Mexico2021Elizabeth Whitefield End-of-Life Options ActPAS6 months terminal
Delaware2025Ron Silverio/Heather Block End of Life Options ActPAS6 months terminal
Illinois2025End-of-Life Options ActPAS6 months terminal
New York2026Medical Aid in Dying ActPAS6 months terminal
Note: Active euthanasia (physician-administered) remains illegal in all U.S. states. All U.S. laws are limited to PAS (patient self-administers). Source: Compassion and Choices Utilization Report 2026; allaboutlawyer.com 2026.
State / Territory Law In Effect Law Name Max Prognosis Notes
VictoriaJune 2019Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 20176 months (12 months neuro)First state in Australia
Western AustraliaJuly 2021Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 20196 months (12 months neuro)N/A
TasmaniaOctober 2022Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 20216 months (12 months neuro)N/A
South AustraliaJanuary 2023Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 20216 months (12 months neuro)N/A
QueenslandJanuary 2023Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 20216 months (12 months neuro)N/A
New South WalesNovember 2023Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 20226 months (12 months neuro)N/A
Australian Capital TerritoryNovember 2025Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 20246 months (12 months neuro)First ACT territory to legalise
Northern Territory: Government inquiry recommended legislation September 2025; no law yet. Source: allaboutlawyer.com 2026; worldpopulationreview.com 2026.
Jurisdiction Current Status Most Recent Development Likelihood 2026–2028
France Bill passed National Assembly (May 2025) Senate review ongoing; supported by President Macron High · 2027
England & Wales Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill · Parliamentary debate 2025–2026 House of Commons passed second reading; committee stage 2026 Moderate · 2027
Isle of Man Assisted Dying Act 2025 passed First jurisdiction in British Isles to legalise Enacted 2025
Scotland Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill · Holyrood Stage 1 2024 Cross-party support; stage 2 committee scrutiny 2025 Moderate
Ireland Committee recommended legislation 2024; majority of TDs voted to note findings Government drafting heads of bill 2025 Moderate · 2027
Slovenia Parliament passed bill; referendum held Nov 2025 Referendum outcome contested; awaiting final result validation Uncertain
Portugal Law 22/2023 passed; regulation still pending As of April 2026, regulation not yet published; law not in force Imminent pending regulation
India Only passive euthanasia legal (Supreme Court 2018) Kahu Advocacy Foundation PIL planned; Change.org petition active Needs PIL + Legislation
Sources: Al Jazeera, Nov 2025; Globe and Mail 2025; allaboutlawyer.com 2026.

Six Pioneer Jurisdictions

The jurisdictions below collectively represent over 95% of the world's assisted-dying data. Their laws, outcomes, and debates provide the evidential foundation for any reform argument — including India's PIL.

Netherlands
Legal since 2002 · 24 years of data
LawTermination of Life on Request Act 2002
TypeEuthanasia + PAS
Age12+ (under 16 needs parental consent)
ConditionUnbearable suffering; no prospect of improvement — terminal or non-terminal
2023 Cases9,068 (5.4% of all deaths)
Oversight5 Regional Review Committees (RTE)
Psychiatric cases138 in 2023 (1.5% of total)
Total (2002–2024 est.)Approx. 120,000+
Belgium
Legal since 2002 · Minors since 2014
LawBelgian Euthanasia Act 2002 (amended 2014)
TypeEuthanasia + PAS
AgeAny age with capacity + parental consent for minors
ConditionConstant unbearable suffering; serious incurable condition — psychiatric eligible
2024 Cases3,991 (3.6% of all deaths)
Total (2002–2023)33,647 reported cases
OversightFederal Commission (FCCEE)
Minor cases total6 since 2014
Canada (MAID)
Legal since 2016 · Expanded 2021
LawCriminal Code C-14 (2016) expanded by C-7 (2021)
TypeEuthanasia + PAS (Euthanasia overwhelmingly dominant)
Age18+ with Canadian health insurance eligibility
TracksTrack 1: Reasonably foreseeable death. Track 2: Non-terminal but grievous condition
2024 Cases16,499 (5.1% of all deaths)
Total (2016–2024)76,475 reported MAID provisions
Track 2 (2024)732 cases — up 17% from 2023
Next expansionMental illness as sole condition: March 2027
Oregon, USA
Legal since 1997 · 29 years of data
LawDeath with Dignity Act 1994 (effect 1997)
TypePAS only (patient self-administers)
ConditionTerminal illness; 6-month prognosis; 18+
ResidencyRemoved 2023 — non-residents now eligible
2024 Deaths376 (approx. 1% of all Oregon deaths)
2024 Prescriptions607 (up 8.2% from 2023)
Total (1998–2024)3,243 confirmed deaths
Top reasonLoss of autonomy (89%), loss of dignity (64%)
Switzerland
Legal by practice since 1942 · Dignitas model
LawArt. 115 Swiss Penal Code — no selfish motive
TypePAS only — no euthanasia
ResidencyNone required — attracts international patients
ProvidersDignitas, Exit Deutsche Schweiz, EXIT A.D.M.D.
Unique featureNon-physicians can assist; no dedicated regulatory regime
Suicide tourismIn 2023, 110+ foreign nationals came to Belgium alone; Switzerland hosts many more
ConditionSuffering-based; no strict terminal requirement
Spain
Legal since June 2021
LawOrganic Law 3/2021 — first European parliamentary law in 2020s
TypeEuthanasia + PAS
AgeAdults (18+); Spanish citizens or legal residents
ConditionIncurable disease or chronic debilitating condition causing intolerable physical or psychological suffering
ProcessTwo written requests (15 days apart); two physician assessments; Guarantee and Evaluation Committee
SignificanceFirst Catholic-majority country to pass law via parliament
Annual Assisted Deaths by Key Jurisdiction (Most Recent Year Available)
Canada 2024 · Belgium 2024 · Netherlands 2023 · Oregon 2024 · New Zealand 2023 est.

24 Years of Numbers

The empirical record from 2002 to 2026 tells a clear story: where euthanasia and PAS laws exist, they are used carefully, grow steadily, and have not produced the predicted catastrophic abuses.

0
Belgium Total (2002–2023)
Cases reported to FCCEE
0
Canada MAID Total (2016–2024)
Official Health Canada data
0
Oregon Deaths (1998–2024)
27 years of DWDA data
0
% of Canadian Deaths (2024)
1 in every 20 deaths
Belgium — Annual Euthanasia Cases (2003–2024)
From 236 cases in 2003 to 3,991 in 2024
Canada MAID Annual Provisions (2016–2024)
From 1,018 in 2016 to 16,499 in 2024
Belgium 2024 — Euthanasia Cases by Primary Condition
3,991 total cases · Oncological conditions remain largest group; polypathologies rising
Oregon 2024 — End-of-Life Concerns Reported
% of 376 patients citing each concern

Canada MAID 2024 — Key Indicators

Track 1 (Reasonably Foreseeable Death)95.6%
Cancer as Primary Condition~63%
Died at Home or Residence~75%
Received Palliative Care~74%
Reported Loss of Meaningful Activities97.5%
Track 2 with Disability (2024)61.5%
Belgium 2024

72.6% of patients were over 70. 43.2% were over 80. Psychiatric and cognitive disorder cases remain at just 1.4% each — contrary to "slippery slope" predictions about psychiatric expansion dominating. Only 6 minors have been euthanised under Belgium's law since minors became eligible in 2014.

The Global Timeline: 1942 to 2026

Every significant legal milestone in the global history of voluntary assisted dying — from the Swiss penal code clause to the newest laws of 2025.

1942

Switzerland — Passive Legal Tolerance

Article 115 of the Swiss Penal Code exempts assisted suicide from punishment if motivated by altruism, not selfishness. This becomes the legal basis for Dignitas (est. 1998) and EXIT decades later.

1994 · 1997

Oregon, USA — Death with Dignity Act

Passed by ballot measure in 1994; survived legal challenges; implemented 1997. World's first modern PAS law. 16 deaths in year one. 376 deaths in 2024 — 27 years of unbroken operation.

1996–1997

Northern Territory, Australia — Brief Legality

Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 allowed 4 deaths before being overturned by Federal parliament's Euthanasia Laws Act 1997 — the first nation in history to both legalise and repeal euthanasia.

2002

Netherlands & Belgium — The Twin Pioneers

Netherlands enacts Termination of Life on Request Act in April 2002. Belgium follows weeks later. Together they create the world's first regulatory model for euthanasia — now 24 years of uninterrupted operation.

2009

Luxembourg & Montana (USA)

Luxembourg passes Act on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide through parliament after defeating conservative challenges. Montana legalises PAS via state Supreme Court ruling in Baxter v. Montana.

2014

Belgium — Minors Included

Belgium extends euthanasia law to minors of any age with decisional capacity and parental consent — making it the first country to remove any lower age limit. Only 6 cases have been recorded in the decade since.

2015

Canada — Carter v. Canada

Supreme Court of Canada unanimously strikes down the criminal prohibition on assisted dying. Bill C-14 passed 2016. Canada quickly becomes the world's largest-scale euthanasia programme.

2015 · 2021

Colombia — Court-Led Reform

Constitutional Court decriminalises euthanasia for terminal patients in 1997; implementation effectively began 2015. Court extended access beyond terminal in 2021. First Latin American nation to legalise.

2019–2023

Australia — Six States in Five Years

Victoria leads (2019), followed by Western Australia (2021), Tasmania and Queensland and South Australia (2022–23), then New South Wales (2023), and ACT (2025). Sequential state implementation with refined safeguards each time.

2021

Spain & New Zealand

Spain passes Organic Law 3/2021 through parliament — first in a traditionally Catholic European nation via legislation. New Zealand passes End of Life Choice Act endorsed by 65.1% in referendum — world's first direct democracy endorsement.

2024

Ecuador — Latest Constitutional Court Reform

Ecuador's Constitutional Court rules in favour of euthanasia following ALS patient Paola Roldan's case — making it the most recent country in Latin America to expand access.

2025–2026

Uruguay, Isle of Man, France, New York, Illinois

Uruguay passes the Dignified Death Bill (Oct 2025) — first predominantly Catholic nation in Latin America to do so legislatively. Isle of Man becomes first British Crown Dependency to legalise. France's National Assembly passes a bill. New York and Illinois enact laws, bringing total U.S. jurisdictions to 14.

"The global legal landscape for assisted dying has changed faster in the past decade than in all of history combined."

allaboutlawyer.com · Global Assisted Dying Status Report, 2026

The Acceleration Is Undeniable

Between 1942 and 2014, fewer than 5 jurisdictions had legalised any form of assisted dying. Since 2015, the rate has tripled. More people now live in jurisdictions with legal access than in any prior decade of recorded history.

New Legal Jurisdictions Per Decade
Counting national laws, state laws, and court-driven access points
Type of Access by World Region (2026)
Euthanasia only vs PAS only vs Both vs Partial / Court-Driven
5+
Countries Debating Laws Right Now
France, England, Scotland, Ireland, Slovenia
65.1%
New Zealand Referendum (2020)
Only country to put it to direct democracy — and won
32.8%
Americans with Legal Access
Up from 0% in 1996

What the Evidence Actually Shows

In the Netherlands, psychiatric euthanasia cases rose from effectively zero in 2002 to 138 in 2023 — representing just 1.5% of all cases after 24 years. In Belgium, psychiatric and cognitive disorder cases stand at 1.4% each of all cases as of 2024. The overwhelming majority — over 75% — involve cancer or polypathologies in elderly patients over 70. Canada has seen faster expansion of eligibility criteria (Track 2 non-terminal, Mental Health expansion planned for 2027), which has generated genuine policy debate. But critics who predicted the laws would quickly expand to cover any preference without safeguards have not been vindicated by the data from the pioneer jurisdictions. Academic analysis published in JAMA Network Open (2025) found that demographic changes explain a significant part of rising case numbers, not criteria expansion.

Belgium's data shows 84.74% of cases involve patients aged 60 or older — reflecting the demographics of serious incurable illness, not vulnerability exploitation. Oregon's data consistently shows MAID patients are predominantly white (92%), educated (45%+ with degrees), and insured (100%) — suggesting access skews toward the privileged, not the disadvantaged. Canada's 2024 report found that MAID recipients "do not disproportionately come from lower-income or disadvantaged communities." However, Canada's Track 2 data (non-terminal) shows 61.5% of recipients self-reported a disability — raising ongoing concerns that inadequate disability support may be driving some requests. The UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has expressed concern about Canada's Track 2 expansion.

The evidence is mixed. In Oregon, 92% of DWDA patients in 2024 were enrolled in hospice care — suggesting palliative and assisted-dying access are not mutually exclusive. In Canada, Health Canada reports that approximately 74% of MAID recipients in 2024 had received palliative care. However, critics note that a third of those received palliative care for less than one month, raising questions about quality. In Belgium and Netherlands, both palliative care infrastructure and assisted dying access have expanded simultaneously over 24 years — no evidence of displacement. The concern is most acute in lower-income countries where palliative care is already absent, making it structurally easier to offer death than care.

Both Belgium and the Netherlands allow euthanasia for psychiatric conditions where suffering is deemed constant, unbearable, and with no prospect of improvement. In the Netherlands, 138 psychiatric-only cases were approved in 2023 — up 20% from 2022's 115, but still representing only 1.5% of all cases. Belgium's FCCEE reports psychiatric and cognitive disorder cases at 1.4% each in 2024. These cases undergo the most rigorous scrutiny, typically requiring additional independent physician consultations including a specialist psychiatrist. Academic research confirms these remain a small and carefully screened cohort. Canada has explicitly delayed mental illness as a sole condition to March 2027 amid ongoing debate.

Oregon's 27-year dataset is the most detailed. In 2024, the three most cited concerns were: loss of autonomy (88.6%), decreasing ability to engage in enjoyable activities (87.8%), and loss of dignity (63.6%). Inadequate pain control was cited by only about 29% of patients. This pattern has been consistent for over two decades. It reveals that the primary driver is not uncontrolled physical pain — which palliative medicine can largely address — but the loss of self-determination and dignity. This directly supports the constitutional autonomy arguments at the core of Kahu Advocacy Foundation's PIL, which argues that the right to dignity under Article 21 cannot be reduced to merely ensuring freedom from pain.

The pandemic accelerated several trends. Canada saw a 36.8% single-year increase from 2019 to 2020 — its highest ever — partly driven by pandemic-related isolation and fear of dying in hospital without family. The Netherlands and Belgium implemented telehealth consultations for initial assessments during lockdowns, reducing access barriers. In Australia, Victoria's newly launched scheme navigated early implementation during the pandemic. Globally, the pandemic intensified public debate about death, dignity, and the right to control one's end-of-life circumstances — shifting public opinion polls toward greater support in every major survey conducted 2020–2022. Several countries that were debating legislation accelerated their timelines post-pandemic.

India vs. The World — The Growing Divide

While 26 jurisdictions have built legal frameworks respecting individual autonomy over end-of-life decisions, India's position remains frozen at 2018's passive-only compromise. Every year this gap widens, the constitutional argument for reform becomes stronger.

India vs Pioneer Nations — Eligibility Scope Comparison
Scoring based on breadth of eligibility (1 = most restrictive, 10 = broadest)

What India Allows vs. What the World Allows

Practice India (2026) Netherlands Canada Spain
Passive euthanasia (withdrawing treatment) Legal Legal Legal Legal
Advance Directive / Living Will Legal (complex process) Legal (simpler) Legal Legal
Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) Illegal Legal Legal Legal
Voluntary Active Euthanasia Illegal Legal Legal Legal
Non-terminal conditions eligible No Yes Yes (Track 2) Yes (debilitating)
Psychiatric suffering eligible No Yes (narrow) 2027 planned Limited

Which Global Model Suits India?

The Colombia model (Constitutional Court-driven reform) is the most relevant precedent. Colombia's Constitutional Court used constitutional autonomy and dignity arguments almost identical to India's Article 21 in striking down its criminal prohibition. India's Supreme Court has already done more — it recognised passive euthanasia (2018). The PIL asks it to go further, as Colombia did.

What Safeguards Should India Build?

Given India's specific vulnerabilities — low health literacy, patriarchal joint families, caste-based exploitation, rural-urban access disparities, and religious plurality — any Indian framework must include: plain-language consent documentation, independent medical boards (not family-mediated), outreach for marginalised communities, and a national oversight body insulated from political pressure.

What Mistakes Must India Avoid?

Canada's rapid expansion without adequate disability support funding is a cautionary tale. The 61.5% disability rate in Track 2 cases underscores the danger of offering death before offering adequate care. India must sequence reform properly: ensure baseline palliative care infrastructure, pass the PIL, build institutional capacity, then expand scope — not the reverse.

"True dignity and autonomy mean absolute sovereignty over one's existence. Without an instant, painless, guaranteed, and accessible right to exit life, existence itself becomes the potential for inescapable suffering."

Kahu Advocacy Foundation · PIL Arguments, Supreme Court of India

Key Findings — What the Global Record Confirms

After 24 years of data across 26 jurisdictions, the evidence is no longer speculative. These are the empirically established facts that underpin Kahu Advocacy Foundation's constitutional argument.

01

Legalisations Accelerate, Not Reverse

No country that has legalised voluntary assisted dying has repealed or suspended its law (the only exception: Australia's Northern Territory 1997 — overturned by federal override, not by democratic choice or evidence of harm). Global momentum is strongly toward expansion.

02

The Primary Driver is Autonomy, Not Pain

Oregon's 27-year record shows loss of autonomy (89%) and loss of dignity (64%) dominate over inadequate pain control (29%). People do not primarily choose assisted dying to escape physical suffering — they choose it to preserve control over their existence. This is precisely the constitutional argument India's PIL makes under Article 21.

03

Psychiatric and Minor Cases Remain Marginal

After 24 years in Belgium and the Netherlands, psychiatric-only euthanasia represents 1.4–1.5% of all cases. Belgium has recorded only 6 minor euthanasias since 2014. Critics' predictions of flood-gate collapse have not materialised in pioneer jurisdictions.

04

Court-Driven Reform Works (Colombia is India's Blueprint)

Colombia, Ecuador, Germany, Austria, and Italy all reformed via court ruling, not legislation. India's Supreme Court has already taken the first step. The Kahu PIL asks it to complete the journey that Colombia's Constitutional Court completed in 2015 — using strikingly similar constitutional arguments about dignity and autonomy.

05

200M+ People Now Have Legal Access

More than 200 million people globally now reside in jurisdictions where some form of assisted dying is legally permitted. India's 1.4 billion citizens remain denied even the narrowest access. This is not philosophical divergence — it is a measurable human rights gap, provable in constitutional terms under Articles 14, 19, and 21.

06

Canada Shows Both the Promise and the Warning

Canada reached 76,475 MAID provisions in 9 years — demonstrating the scale of unmet need when access opens. But the 17% rise in non-terminal (Track 2) cases and the 61.5% disability rate in that track demonstrate that assisted dying must be accompanied by robust social and disability support — a lesson India must hardwire into its reform from day one.

Your Signature Builds the PIL

When this petition reaches critical mass, Kahu Advocacy Foundation will file a Public Interest Litigation in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India — arguing that Article 21 already guarantees this right. Sign today. Share widely. The world has moved on. It is time India does too.

Continue Reading

This is Page 3 of a 5-part research series by Kahu Advocacy Foundation. Each page dives deeper into a specific aspect of the global and Indian euthanasia landscape.

Kahu Advocacy Foundation Welcome to WhatsApp chat
Start a conversation with our team
Type here...